Frequently asked questions
To install the biometric attendance machine, follow these steps: 1. Choose a suitable location for the device. 2. Mount the device securely on the wall. 3. Connect the device to a power source. 4. Configure the device settings according to the user manual. 5. Enroll employees' biometric data into the system. 6. Test the device to ensure it is working correctly.
Face recognition analyzes unique facial features—such as the distance between the eyes, cheekbone shape, jawline, and contours—to verify identity. Fingerprint recognition scans the unique ridges and valleys on your fingertip. Both methods are biometric authentication but use different types of biological data.
Face recognition is completely contactless, making it perfect for sanitary or hands-free settings like hospitals, offices, and airports. Fingerprint systems need physical touch, which can be a hygiene issue in high-traffic areas and less suitable for environments requiring minimal contact, such as post-pandemic health measures or sterile settings.
Accuracy can vary based on the quality of the hardware and algorithms used. Fingerprint recognition is generally seen as slightly more mature, especially in controlled environments, and tends to have a lower False Acceptance Rate (FAR). However, advanced face recognition technologies equipped with 3D sensors and deep learning algorithms have closed the gap significantly. These systems now detect liveness and prevent spoofing using photos or videos, making them highly reliable.
Face recognition usually offers a smoother user experience. There's no need to stop and touch a sensor—just glance at the terminal and go. This makes it well-suited for high-traffic scenarios. Fingerprint devices require users to press a specific area, which can slow things down, particularly when the scanner has trouble reading a fingerprint on the first try.
Yes, both are secure, but in different ways. Fingerprints are very difficult to forge, but sensors can occasionally be deceived by lifted prints or molds—although modern scanners have anti-spoofing features. Face recognition systems with 3D cameras and liveness detection help prevent spoofing with printed photos or videos. That said, multi-factor authentication, such as combining biometrics with PINs or access cards, significantly enhances security for either method.
Face recognition is better for large-scale deployment in places where speed and hygiene are crucial, like airports, stadiums, or large office complexes, as it allows for continuous, flow-based entry. Fingerprint systems are more suitable for smaller settings with fewer users, such as gyms or small businesses, and usually have a lower initial cost.
Fingerprint technology is more familiar and trusted by many because it's been used for years in everything from smartphone unlocking to time attendance machines. However, users are increasingly drawn to the convenience and touchless appeal of face recognition. In environments where user experience matters—like customer-facing lobbies—face recognition tends to feel more premium and modern.
Yes, fingerprint systems are generally cheaper to implement since the technology is older and easier to mass-produce. Face recognition systems, especially those with advanced cameras and processors, are more expensive upfront but can offer better ROI through improved efficiency and hygiene over time.
Absolutely. Both technologies can integrate with a wide range of systems, including smart locks, attendance management, visitor tracking, CCTV surveillance, and even mobile apps. Many modern access control solutions offer modularity—allowing you to mix and match biometrics with other access methods to suit different access points or user roles.